| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Current Filter: CAD>>>>>Case Study> The real cost of rebar Editorial Type: Case Study Date: 05-2014 Views: 5500 Key Topics: CAD Structural Engineering Structural Modelling BIM Key Companies: Tekla Celsa Steel Service Key Products: Tekla Structures Key Industries: | |||
| Celsa Steel Service used Tekla Structures to enhance its reinforcement production - a BIM process that enabled the company to focus on the total cost of reinforcement The construction industry is frequently criticised for its lax attitude towards increasing productivity. Celsa Steel Service, however, operates in a totally different way to the majority of its competitors in reinforcement manufacturing, as it looks at the total cost of reinforcement for its clients - not just the cost of steel, but also at logistics and assembly. Celsa decided to shift its focus towards total costs in order to take a more active role in the customers' processes, understand their needs and develop products and services that cut project duration and costs on site. After comprehensive research, the company concluded that the implementation of building information modelling (BIM) would open new doors, and provide their customers with more cost effective processes and services which could ultimately cut costly waste and add value to projects.
WHAT IS THE ACTUAL COST OF REBAR? The variation in results may partly be explained by differences in projects and their logistic conditions, but the largest difference lies in how the material is handled on site. There is obviously room for improvement then. According to the study, up to 45 percent of the time that rebar installers spend on site consists of inactivity - wasted time that could be saved, aggravated by rebar material being moved to intermediate storage locations on an average 2 to 4 times before installation. From this, it is plain that enabling contractors to plan production and improved cooperation with rebar providers can lead to better material flow, with the potential to create financially meaningful savings.
HALLANDSÃ…SEN TUNNEL Additionally, Celsa saved both cost and time on site for their customer because the 3D model used highlighted some simple errors - rebars being too long, for instance - early on in the design process.
CHOOSING TEKLA Celsa uses Tekla in a number of ways: First of all, it is used to create 3D models from the consultants' drawings, which are subsequently used to implement quality control. It facilitates product selection, and can then be used to illustrate tenders and solutions for customers and, finally, provide assembly instructions. With a 3D model, even welders understand more fully where and what to weld! "it is simpler to discuss if we have the 3D model in front of us than it is with drawings," says Thomas Eriksson.
BIM FOR COLLABORATION AND INVOLVEMENT To achieve this, the company believes that two components must exist: first, the tools to create, share, visualise and exchange data in real time, and secondly, competent people and companies with the same mindset to share the same goals. "BIM and Tekla Structures represent the tools, ideas and visions that we believe must exist to develop the reinforcement process and be more cost efficient," says Tore Bexér, CEO of Celsa Steel Service.
Page 1 2 | ||
Like this article? Click here to get the Newsletter and Magazine Free! | |||
Email The Editor! OR Forward Article | Go Top | ||
PREVIOUS | NEXT |