Banner
Backup D.R. Replication Virtualisation Hardware/Media Privacy

Current Filter: Storage>>>>>Technology Focus>

PREVIOUS

Filtered Articles:1 of 17   Current Article ID:5133

NEXT



Believe the hype about hyper-converged storage

Editorial Type: Technology Focus     Date: 01-2015    Views: 3714      





Sushant Rao of DataCore Software details real-world scenarios of how a hyper-converged infrastructure is the right approach to combine storage, compute, networking and virtualisation in one unit

One of the fundamental requirements for virtualising applications is the underlying shared storage. Applications can move around to different servers as long as those servers have access to the storage with the application and its data. Typically, shared storage takes place over a Storage Area Network (SAN). However, SANs typically have issues in virtualised environments. The first is providing consistent, reliable I/O performance where it is needed. As different applications start, stop and process data, the load on the SAN varies greatly. If a database starts a large job processing data, the SAN may become overwhelmed, which will start impacting the performance of other applications that are acting in a normal state.

Applications that are performance-sensitive are particularly susceptible to this issue, including databases (Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server); applications and ERP systems based on databases (SAP, Oracle Applications, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Dynamics); VDI (VMware and Citrix); and communications systems (Microsoft Exchange, VoIP). In addition, as the number of applications in the environment grows, IT needs to be able to scale out infrastructure seamlessly and quickly. Any time maintenance is done on a SAN, the storage needs to go offline, leading to a disruption. Another issue, especially in smaller environments such as remote sites, is the reliability and complexity of SANs. When remote or regional locations (retail shops, bank branches, manufacturing plants, call centres, distribution centres, surgeries, etc.) have applications on-site, IT needs to address issues with availability and management of the infrastructure. In the simplest case, an office has two servers to ensure high availability at the compute layer.

However, the servers are connected to a SAN (typically a low-end storage array and network connections), which itself is a single point of failure. If the SAN goes offline for any reason it doesn't matter that there are two servers; the applications have an outage, which disrupts the business. Usually there are no IT staff on-site, so simplicity of management and reducing complexity are very important. Due to the challenges of using SANs in a virtual environment, organisations are currently looking for new options. Hyper-converged infrastructure is a solution that seems well-suited to address these issues.

WHY HYPER-CONVERGED?
To provide consistent high-performance, IT can create application-specific clusters. By running the same type of application on the cluster (e.g. databases), IT is able to manage performance and identify/resolve bottlenecks more effectively. In addition, to avoid the performance limitations of a SAN, hyper-converged storage utilises Direct-Attached Storage (DAS) within servers as shared storage, moving data closer to the applications. This architecture provides better I/O performance closer to the application (therefore creating better response times), resulting in less complexity and lower cost.

RELIABLE APPLICATION PERFORMANCE
A hospital recently used DataCore Software's Virtual SAN software to create a hyper-converged system to achieve better and more consistent application performance. The hospital had 12 physical servers running its PBX system. The organisation wanted to virtualise this application (into 12 VMs) but it was essential to provide the same level of reliable performance as the physical servers (since voice communication is vital in a hospital environment). The hospital knew it wanted a dedicated cluster for the virtualised PBX application. But, its IT staff were not satisfied with available options, such as VMware Virtual SAN, which required a minimum of three physical servers (and later, they learned that actually four servers were recommended).

The consensus was that utilising three servers to run 12 VMs was wasteful and unnecessarily expensive. Instead, the hospital chose DataCore's Virtual SAN software. This solution only required two servers for failover, which reduced costs by 33% from the onset. In addition, DataCore Virtual SAN uses adaptive RAM caching to accelerate I/O. RAM is generally 10x faster than Flash storage, so the performance of the virtualised PBX was "through the roof." In addition, the RAM caching meant that Flash storage was optional, further reducing costs for the hospital.



Page   1  2

Like this article? Click here to get the Newsletter and Magazine Free!

Email The Editor!         OR         Forward ArticleGo Top


PREVIOUS

                    


NEXT